3 Best AI Video Generators 2026: Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0 vs Veo 3.1 (Tested)

**Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, and Veo 3.1 are the three best AI video generators in 2026.** In our blind-prompt testing on [Clipia.ai](/en/create-video), Seedance 2.0 leads overall visual quality (ELO 1,273, #1 on Artificial Analysis), Kling 3.0 wins motion physics, audio, and multi-scene storytelling, and Veo 3.1 is the simplest for quick drafts. Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3.0 run on Clipia.ai from a single account, so you can switch models in one click. While you were reading articles about "top AI video generators" — they featured Kling 2.6 and Seedance 1.5. Good models. Were. In the past three months, a quiet revolution happened: ByteDance shipped Seedance 2.0, Kuaishou answered with Kling 3.0, and Google surprised everyone with Veo 3, immediately updating it to 3.1. Three giants. Three approaches to video generation. And three completely different results on the same prompts. I ran all three models through identical scenarios: cinematics, action, portraits, complex lighting. Results are below — with real videos, prompts, and pricing. --- ## What Changed in AI Video in 2026 If the last time you looked at AI video you saw jerky hands and melting faces — forget it. The new generation of models produces video that's **genuinely hard to distinguish from real footage**. - **Audio.** All three models now generate sound: dialogue, ambient sounds, music — right with the video - **Duration.** Up to 15 seconds of continuous video (a year ago the ceiling was 4–5) - **Resolution.** Up to 2K on Seedance, 1080p on Kling and Veo - **Physics.** Water, fabric, hair — now move correctly. Hands no longer melt ### Who's on Top of the Leaderboard According to [Artificial Analysis](https://artificialanalysis.ai/video/leaderboard/text-to-video) — the largest independent leaderboard (72 models, 45,000+ blind votes) at the time of our testing: | Model | ELO (T2V) | ELO (I2V) | Position | |-------|:---------:|:---------:|:--------:| | **Seedance 2.0** | **1,273** | **1,356** | #1 | | **Kling 3.0 Pro** | **1,241** | **1,298** | #4 | | **Veo 3** | **1,221** | — | #10 | :::callout{type="info"} ELO ratings are based on blind comparisons: users see two videos without model names and pick the better one. Higher ELO = more frequent wins. The leaderboard moves fast — [HappyHorse by Alibaba](/en/blog/happyhorse-alibaba-ai-video-model-top-leaderboard-2026) has since climbed into the top tier as well. ::: --- ## What Each Model Can Do ### [Seedance 2.0](/en/video-models/seedance-2) — The Artist **Modes:** Text-to-Video, Image-to-Video **Resolution:** up to 2K | **Duration:** 4–15 sec | **Audio:** dialogue, lip-sync, ambient **Killer feature:** up to 9 reference images in I2V. Upload photos of your character, background, objects — and reference them via `@image1`, `@image2` in the prompt. The model preserves their appearance in the video. No other model can do this. :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/demo-presets/v2/seedance-2-demo.mp4" prompt="A colossal futuristic city skyline at dawn with bioluminescent architecture, flying vehicles casting neon trails, atmospheric dust particles in volumetric light rays, smooth parallax camera movement revealing hidden details, cinematic sci-fi atmosphere" model="Seedance 2.0"} ### [Kling 3.0](/en/video-models/kling-3) — The Director **Modes:** Text-to-Video, I2V, **Multi-Shot**, Motion Control, Lip Sync **Resolution:** up to 1080p | **Duration:** 3–15 sec | **Audio:** 5 languages (EN, CN, JP, KR, ES) **Killer feature:** Multi-Shot — up to 6 scenes with individual prompts for each. A mini-film in a single request. Plus Motion Control (transfer motion from video to photo) and Lip Sync (voice avatar from audio file). :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/demo-presets/v2/kling-3-demo.mp4" prompt="A colossal ancient tree standing at the center of a floating island, its massive roots hanging into the clouds below like waterfalls of wood, thousands of bioluminescent butterflies emerging from the glowing canopy into the twilight sky, camera slowly rising from the base upward, epic orchestral fantasy" model="Kling 3.0 Pro"} ### Veo 3.1 — The Minimalist **Modes:** Fast, Quality (Text-to-Video only) **Resolution:** up to 1080p | **Duration:** 8 sec (fixed) | **Audio:** auto-generated **Killer feature:** simplicity. Minimal parameters — the model decides aspect ratio and style. One prompt — one result. Perfect for quick drafts and atmospheric scenes. :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/demo-presets/v2/veo3-quality-demo.mp4" prompt="A master glassblower in a dimly lit Venetian workshop, molten glass glowing orange-red on the blowpipe, sparks flying with each breath, the artisan's weathered hands working with precise movements, dramatic warm side light, the glass slowly taking the shape of an elegant swan, documentary cinematography" model="Veo 3.1 Quality"} --- ## Seedance vs Kling vs Veo: Full Comparison Table | Feature | Seedance 2.0 | Kling 3.0 | Veo 3.1 | |---------|:------------:|:---------:|:-------:| | Text-to-Video | Yes | Yes | Yes | | Image-to-Video | Yes (up to 9 photos) | Yes (1–2 photos) | No | | Multi-Shot (scenes) | No | Yes (up to 6 scenes) | No | | Motion Control | No | Yes | No | | Lip Sync | No | Yes | No | | Max resolution | 2K | 1080p | 1080p | | Max duration | 15 sec | 15 sec | 8 sec | | Audio | Yes (auto) | Yes (5 languages) | Yes (auto) | | Quality modes | Fast / Preview | Standard / Pro | Fast / Quality | | ELO (T2V) | 1,273 (#1) | 1,241 (#4) | 1,221 (#10) | | Price on Clipia.ai (5 sec) | 34 credits | 36 credits | not on Clipia | --- ## Test 1: Cinematics — Tokyo at Night The classic visual quality test: neon lights, reflections on wet pavement, atmospheric fog. Shows how each model handles detail, lighting, and depth. :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/cinematic-seedance.mp4" prompt="Cinematic tracking shot through a rain-soaked Tokyo alley at night. Neon signs in Japanese reflecting off wet cobblestones, steam rising from a ramen stall, a lone figure with a transparent umbrella walking away from camera. Shallow depth of field, anamorphic lens flares, film grain. The camera glides forward slowly, revealing layers of depth — hanging lanterns, dripping pipes, distant city glow. Shot on ARRI Alexa with Panavision C-series anamorphic lenses." model="Seedance 2.0 Fast · 5 sec · 34 credits"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/cinematic-kling.mp4" prompt="Cinematic tracking shot through a rain-soaked Tokyo alley at night. Neon signs in Japanese reflecting off wet cobblestones, steam rising from a ramen stall, a lone figure with a transparent umbrella walking away from camera. Shallow depth of field, anamorphic lens flares, film grain. The camera glides forward slowly, revealing layers of depth — hanging lanterns, dripping pipes, distant city glow. Shot on ARRI Alexa with Panavision C-series anamorphic lenses." model="Kling 3.0 Pro"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/cinematic-veo.mp4" prompt="Cinematic tracking shot through a rain-soaked Tokyo alley at night. Neon signs in Japanese reflecting off wet cobblestones, steam rising from a ramen stall, a lone figure with a transparent umbrella walking away from camera. Shallow depth of field, anamorphic lens flares, film grain. The camera glides forward slowly, revealing layers of depth — hanging lanterns, dripping pipes, distant city glow. Shot on ARRI Alexa with Panavision C-series anamorphic lenses." model="Veo 3.1 Quality"} **Seedance 2.0:** Best detail. Neon signs are legible, reflections on wet asphalt — every puddle rendered individually. Steam from the ramen stall is subtle, not overdone. Camera glides forward smoothly, revealing depth layers. Film grain as requested. **Kling 3.0 Pro:** Excellent atmosphere and sound: rain noise, distant bar music, footsteps. Confident camera movement. Slightly less texture detail (kanji on signs less crisp), but compensates with more natural figure movement. **Veo 3.1 Quality:** Beautiful composition and lighting, but 8 seconds isn't enough for a proper tracking shot. Camera shows the beginning of the alley but doesn't reveal the depth. Rain sound is pleasant but lacks detail. :::callout{type="tip"} **Verdict:** Seedance for visual perfection, Kling for full immersion with sound, Veo for a quick sketch. ::: --- ## Test 2: Nature — Icelandic Wave Physics test: water, light, scale. Shows how each model handles dynamic natural phenomena. :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/nature-seedance.mp4" prompt="Aerial drone shot of a massive wave forming and crashing on a volcanic black sand beach in Iceland during golden hour. The wave curls into a perfect barrel, sunlight refracting through the translucent water creating a prismatic rainbow effect inside the tube. White foam explodes on impact, mist rising into the warm amber light. Camera tracks the wave from above, then swoops down to follow it crashing on shore. Epic scale, raw natural power. 4K cinematic quality." model="Seedance 2.0 Fast · 5 sec · 34 credits"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/nature-kling.mp4" prompt="Aerial drone shot of a massive wave forming and crashing on a volcanic black sand beach in Iceland during golden hour. The wave curls into a perfect barrel, sunlight refracting through the translucent water creating a prismatic rainbow effect inside the tube. White foam explodes on impact, mist rising into the warm amber light. Camera tracks the wave from above, then swoops down to follow it crashing on shore. Epic scale, raw natural power. 4K cinematic quality." model="Kling 3.0 Pro"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/nature-veo.mp4" prompt="Aerial drone shot of a massive wave forming and crashing on a volcanic black sand beach in Iceland during golden hour. The wave curls into a perfect barrel, sunlight refracting through the translucent water creating a prismatic rainbow effect inside the tube. White foam explodes on impact, mist rising into the warm amber light. Camera tracks the wave from above, then swoops down to follow it crashing on shore. Epic scale, raw natural power. 4K cinematic quality." model="Veo 3.1 Quality"} **Seedance 2.0:** 10 seconds of epic power. The wave forms gradually, the barrel is translucent — you can see light refracting inside. Foam scatters realistically on impact. Camera smoothly transitions from overhead to side view. Best lighting of the three. **Kling 3.0 Pro:** Powerful dynamics — the wave feels heavy and fast. The shore impact is impressive. Surf and wind sounds add immersion. But the camera transition from above to below is slightly jerky. **Veo 3.1 Quality:** Beautiful, but 8 seconds only fits the formation and beginning of the crash. The climax — shore impact — gets cut off. For epic nature scenes, you need duration. :::callout{type="tip"} **Verdict:** Seedance for epic nature (15 sec tells the full story). Kling for powerful dynamics with sound. Veo only for short sketches. ::: --- ## Test 3: Portrait — Potter's Hands The litmus test for AI video: hands, fingers, fine motor skills. Six months ago, this was impossible. :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/portrait-seedance.mp4" prompt="Extreme close-up of an elderly Japanese ceramics master's hands shaping a delicate raku tea bowl on a spinning wheel. The weathered, clay-stained fingers move with practiced precision, pressing grooves into the wet clay. Steam wisps rise from the surface. Warm side light from a workshop window catches the texture of his skin and the glistening clay. Shallow depth of field, the background a soft blur of wooden shelves filled with finished pottery. Meditative, quiet, intimate. Documentary cinematography." model="Seedance 2.0 Fast · 5 sec · 34 credits"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/portrait-kling.mp4" prompt="Extreme close-up of an elderly Japanese ceramics master's hands shaping a delicate raku tea bowl on a spinning wheel. The weathered, clay-stained fingers move with practiced precision, pressing grooves into the wet clay. Steam wisps rise from the surface. Warm side light from a workshop window catches the texture of his skin and the glistening clay. Shallow depth of field, the background a soft blur of wooden shelves filled with finished pottery. Meditative, quiet, intimate. Documentary cinematography." model="Kling 3.0 Pro"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/portrait-veo.mp4" prompt="Extreme close-up of an elderly Japanese ceramics master's hands shaping a delicate raku tea bowl on a spinning wheel. The weathered, clay-stained fingers move with practiced precision, pressing grooves into the wet clay. Steam wisps rise from the surface. Warm side light from a workshop window catches the texture of his skin and the glistening clay. Shallow depth of field, the background a soft blur of wooden shelves filled with finished pottery. Meditative, quiet, intimate. Documentary cinematography." model="Veo 3.1 Quality"} **Seedance 2.0:** Fingers! No artifacts! Clay deforms under the hands realistically — you can see finger pressure. Steam from wet clay is subtle, like reality. Skin texture detailed down to wrinkles and pores. Best result of the three. **Kling 3.0 Pro:** Good hands too, but one moment where a thumb slightly "sinks" into the clay. Sound of the potter's wheel and clay scraping — excellent bonus. Soft window light, beautiful depth of field. **Veo 3.1 Quality:** Best composition of the three — Google understands cinematic aesthetics: light, shadows, focus. But hands — one moment with an extra finger. Classic AI artifact. :::callout{type="tip"} **Verdict:** Seedance leads in portraits and anatomy. Kling compensates with sound. Veo is beautiful but still makes hand errors. ::: --- ## Test 4: Action — Rooftop Parkour Physics of motion test: acceleration, inertia, landing. Camera must follow the subject in real time. :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/action-seedance.mp4" prompt="High-energy tracking shot of a freerunner in a red jacket performing a massive precision jump between two rooftops at sunset. Camera mounted on a drone follows from behind in real-time speed. The athlete sprints, plants their foot on the ledge, launches across a 4-meter gap, arms windmilling, and lands in a roll on the opposite rooftop. The red jacket flaps violently in the wind. City skyline glowing orange and magenta behind. Dust and gravel scatter on impact. Raw, powerful, athletic. No slow motion." model="Seedance 2.0 Fast · 5 sec · 34 credits"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/action-kling.mp4" prompt="High-energy tracking shot of a freerunner in a red jacket performing a massive precision jump between two rooftops at sunset. Camera mounted on a drone follows from behind in real-time speed. The athlete sprints, plants their foot on the ledge, launches across a 4-meter gap, arms windmilling, and lands in a roll on the opposite rooftop. The red jacket flaps violently in the wind. City skyline glowing orange and magenta behind. Dust and gravel scatter on impact. Raw, powerful, athletic. No slow motion." model="Kling 3.0 Pro"} :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/blog/seedance-vs-kling-vs-veo/action-veo.mp4" prompt="High-energy tracking shot of a freerunner in a red jacket performing a massive precision jump between two rooftops at sunset. Camera mounted on a drone follows from behind in real-time speed. The athlete sprints, plants their foot on the ledge, launches across a 4-meter gap, arms windmilling, and lands in a roll on the opposite rooftop. The red jacket flaps violently in the wind. City skyline glowing orange and magenta behind. Dust and gravel scatter on impact. Raw, powerful, athletic. No slow motion." model="Veo 3.1 Quality"} **Seedance 2.0:** Smooth movement, but slightly "floaty" — gravity at 80%. The jump looks beautiful but not physical. Jacket flutters correctly, dust on landing exists. Aesthetically excellent. Physically — not quite. **Kling 3.0 Pro:** Best action of the three. Sprint, push-off, flight, landing — you feel the weight. Jacket snaps in the wind rather than just fluttering. Camera shakes like a real drone. Sound: wind in the mic, landing impact, gravel crunch. Feels like real drone footage. **Veo 3.1 Quality:** Decent, but 8 seconds is a disaster for action. Fits the sprint and start of the jump. Landing gets cut. Unfinished action = failure. :::callout{type="tip"} **Verdict:** Kling is the undisputed leader in dynamics. Body physics, sound, camera — everything works. Seedance is beautiful but weightless. Veo is too short. ::: --- ## Test 5: Multi-Shot — Mini-Film (Kling 3.0 Only) A unique Kling 3.0 feature — up to 6 scenes with individual prompts and durations. Neither Seedance nor Veo can do this. :::example{src="https://media.clipia.ai/demo-presets/v2/kling-3-multi-shot-demo.mp4" prompt="Scene 1 (5s): Extreme close-up of a mysterious mechanical compass on a dusty antique desk. Its brass needle suddenly spins wildly, then locks onto a direction. Warm amber light emanates from glowing symbols etched into its face. Sound of ticking gears. Scene 2 (5s): Wide shot of a young female explorer in a leather jacket pushing through dense jungle foliage, compass in hand. Shafts of golden sunlight pierce the canopy, illuminating swirling insects and floating spores. Sounds of exotic birds and rustling leaves. Scene 3 (5s): The explorer emerges into a clearing. Camera slowly tilts up to reveal a colossal ancient temple covered in luminescent moss and flowering vines. Flocks of colorful birds scatter from the ruins. Epic orchestral swell. Golden hour light." model="Kling 3.0 Multi-Shot"} Three scenes, 15 seconds, connected narrative. Scene transitions are smooth, style is consistent. The compass is detailed down to brass engravings. The jungle is dense with light piercing through the canopy. The temple is massive. :::callout{type="info"} **Multi-Shot cannot be replicated on Seedance or Veo.** With those, you'd generate one scene at a time and stitch manually. Multi-Shot is proto-directing: you write the script, the model creates connected footage. ::: --- ## Which AI Video Generator Should You Use? | Task | Best Model | Why | |------|:----------:|-----| | Cinematic footage | [Seedance 2.0](/en/video-models/seedance-2) | Detail, 2K, up to 15 sec | | Reels / TikTok | [Kling 3.0](/en/video-models/kling-3) | Dynamics, audio in 5 languages | | Multi-scene mini-film | [Kling 3.0 Multi-Shot](/en/video-models/kling-3) | Only model with scene mode | | Animate a photo | [Seedance 2.0 I2V](/en/video-models/seedance-2) | Best face preservation, 9 references | | Transfer motion | [Kling 3.0 Motion Control](/en/video-models/kling-3) | Reference video + reference image | | Voice avatar | [Kling 3.0 Lip Sync](/en/video-models/kling-3) | Photo + audio file → talking avatar | | Quick draft | [Seedance 2.0 Fast](/en/video-models/seedance-2) | Fast previews, minimal setup | | Timelapse / atmosphere | [Seedance 2.0](/en/video-models/seedance-2) | Duration + detail | | Product shot | [Seedance 2.0](/en/video-models/seedance-2) | Clean aesthetics, stability | --- ## How Much Does an AI Video Cost on Clipia.ai? Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3.0 are available on [Clipia.ai](/en/create-video) — single platform, single account, international payments. Prices below are live Clipia.ai rates (July 2026). ### Video Cost in Credits | Model | 5 sec | 10 sec | 15 sec | |-------|:-----:|:------:|:------:| | Seedance 2.0 | 34 | 68 | 102 | | Kling 3.0 (720p) | 36 | 72 | 131 | | Kling 3.0 (720p + audio) | 54 | 97 | 193 | | Kling 3.0 (1080p + audio) | 72 | 129 | 193 | ### Clipia.ai Plans | Plan | Price/mo | Credits | What You Get | |------|:--------:|:-------:|-------------| | Basic | $15 | 240 | ~7 Seedance clips (5 sec) | | Standard | $29 | 480 | ~14 Seedance clips | | Pro | $49 | 960 | ~28 Seedance clips | | Ultima | $149 | 2,900 | ~85 Seedance clips | Annual billing saves 10%. The trial costs $2.99 and includes 55 credits for 7 days. :::callout{type="tip"} **Tip:** Start with Standard — 480 credits is enough to try Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3.0 and figure out which fits your workflow. ::: --- ## 5 Mistakes Everyone Makes ### 1. Non-English Prompts :::callout{type="warning"} All three models are trained primarily on English data. Non-English prompts produce 30–40% worse results. Even if the interface is in your language — write prompts in English. ::: **Bad:** "Girl walking in autumn park" **Good:** :::prompt A young woman walking through an autumn park, golden leaves falling around her, soft afternoon sunlight filtering through the canopy, cinematic shallow depth of field, warm color grading ::: ### 2. Not Specifying Camera Movement Camera is 50% of the result. Without direction, the model defaults to a static shot. **Add:** `tracking shot`, `dolly-in`, `crane shot`, `handheld camera`, `drone following from behind`, `slow orbit` ### 3. Too Short a Prompt "Cat on a table" — and you'll get a cat on a table. No context, no mood, no story. **Good prompt formula:** Action + Subject + Environment + Light + Camera + Style :::prompt A tabby cat cautiously walking across a sunlit kitchen table, knocking over a glass of milk in slow motion. Morning light streaming through lace curtains, dust particles floating in the beam. Close-up tracking shot. Warm vintage color palette. ::: ### 4. Using One Model for Everything There is no "best model." There's the best model for a specific task. Seedance for beauty, Kling for dynamics and sound, Veo for speed and simplicity. ### 5. Ignoring Quality Settings - **Kling 3.0** has Pro mode — noticeably better than Standard - **Seedance 2.0** Preview quality is higher than Fast - **Veo 3.1** Quality vs Fast — difference in detail and stability Always check which mode is selected before generating. --- ## Bonus: Ready-to-Use Prompts Copy and try on any of the three models. **Cinematic landscape:** :::prompt A colossal ancient tree standing at the center of a floating island, its massive roots hanging down into the clouds like wooden waterfalls. Thousands of bioluminescent butterflies swirling around the canopy. Golden hour light, god rays piercing through the branches. Epic wide shot, slow drone orbit. Fantasy world, cinematic color grading. ::: **Master portrait:** :::prompt A master glassblower in a dimly lit Venetian workshop carefully shaping molten glass into a delicate swan figure. Orange glow from the furnace illuminating his concentrated face and weathered hands. Close-up, shallow depth of field. The glass slowly taking shape with each rotation. Documentary cinematography, warm amber tones. ::: **Dynamic scene:** :::prompt High-speed tracking shot of a cheetah sprinting across African savanna at full speed, dust clouds exploding behind each powerful stride. Golden sunset light, motion blur on the grass. The muscles ripple under the spotted fur. Shot on telephoto lens, National Geographic cinematography. ::: **Underwater world:** :::prompt Underwater macro shot of a coral reef at sunrise. Light rays penetrating through crystal clear tropical water, creating dancing caustics on the sandy floor. A school of neon-colored fish swimming in mesmerizing synchronized patterns. Gentle ocean current moving the soft corals. Calm, meditative, beautiful. 4K natural colors. ::: **Sci-fi atmosphere:** :::prompt A lone astronaut standing on the edge of a massive crater on Mars, looking down at an ancient alien structure half-buried in red dust. Two moons visible in the pink twilight sky. Fine sand particles carried by the wind, catching the fading light. Wide establishing shot, dramatic sense of scale and solitude. ::: --- ## Real Cost of a 1-Minute Video Below is the actual credit cost on Clipia.ai to assemble a full 1-minute video by stitching short clips in any editor. Use this to plan production budgets. | Model | Clips needed | Credits for 1 min | Best for | |-------|:------------:|------------------:|----------| | [Seedance 2.0](/en/video-models/seedance-2) | 6 × 10 sec | 408 credits | Detail, characters, multi-reference | | [Kling 3.0](/en/video-models/kling-3) | 6 × 10 sec | 432 credits | Fantasy, complex scenes, sound | **Takeaway:** for the finished reel where detail matters — Seedance 2.0. For the flagship trailer with scale and dynamics — Kling 3.0. On the **Basic** plan ($15/mo, 240 credits) you can produce about half a minute of Seedance 2.0 footage (3 × 10-sec clips) per month. --- ## Final Verdict: The 3 Best AI Video Generators in 2026 **#1 [Seedance 2.0](/en/video-models/seedance-2)** — best visual quality, leaderboard champion at the time of testing, up to 2K, up to 15 seconds, 9 reference images for I2V. The choice for production, advertising, and content where every frame matters. From 34 credits on Clipia.ai. **#2 [Kling 3.0](/en/video-models/kling-3)** — most versatile: Multi-Shot for mini-films, Motion Control for motion transfer, Lip Sync for avatars. Best movement physics and audio in 5 languages. The Swiss army knife of video generation. From 36 credits on Clipia.ai. **#3 Veo 3.1** — simplest and most affordable. One prompt — one result. Great for atmospheric scenes and quick drafts. But 8-second limit and no I2V are serious limitations. Veo runs on Google's AI Pro/Ultra plans — it's a benchmark here, not part of the Clipia catalog. **My advice:** don't pick just one — use both. Seedance for final quality, Kling for storytelling and action. **Try Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3.0 on [Clipia.ai](/en/create-video)** — switch between models in one click. --- ## More on AI Video Generation - [How to Create Video from Photo: 5 Best Methods in 2026](/en/blog/how-to-create-video-from-photo) - [AI Video Generation: The Complete Guide](/en/blog/video-generation-complete-guide) - [HappyHorse by Alibaba: The New Leaderboard Challenger](/en/blog/happyhorse-alibaba-ai-video-model-top-leaderboard-2026) ---

Which AI video generator is best in 2026?
Seedance 2.0 is the best overall AI video generator in 2026 by blind-vote ELO rating (1,273, #1 on Artificial Analysis at the time of testing): best detail, 2K resolution, up to 15 seconds. Kling 3.0 is best for motion physics, audio, and multi-scene storytelling. Veo 3.1 is the best budget option. Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3.0 are available on Clipia.ai from a single account.

Which model is best for beginners?
Seedance 2.0 in Fast mode — minimal settings and a quick result. Write your prompt in English, click "Create" — done. Once you're comfortable with prompting, switch to Preview quality or Kling 3.0 for more advanced results.

Can I generate video with non-English prompts?
Technically yes — all three models accept non-English text. But results will be 30–40% lower quality: less accurate details, misinterpreted descriptions. We recommend writing prompts in English — even if the Clipia interface is in your language.

How much does one video cost?
On Clipia.ai: Seedance 2.0, 10 seconds: 68 credits (~$4.10). Kling 3.0, 10 seconds at 1080p with audio: 129 credits (~$7.80). A 5-second Seedance clip is 34 credits. Full pricing table above in the "How Much Does an AI Video Cost" section.

What makes Multi-Shot different from regular generation?
Regular generation creates one continuous scene. Multi-Shot (Kling 3.0 only) lets you define up to 6 separate scenes with different prompts and durations — the model generates a connected video with smooth transitions. It's proto-directing: you write the script, the model creates connected footage.

What video formats are supported?
All models generate MP4. Seedance and Kling support aspect ratios 16:9 (landscape), 9:16 (vertical for Reels/TikTok), and 1:1 (square). Veo 3.1 generates 16:9 or 9:16 depending on the model variant selected.